BiblioAlertes du 23 novembre 2006

23 novembre 2006 par Frank Arnould

Centofanti, A.T., & Reece, J. (2006). The cognitive interview and its effect on misleading postevent information. Psychology, Crime and Law, vol. 12, n° 6, 669-683.

Dahl, L.C., Lindsay, D.S., & Brimacombe, C.A.E. (2006). Investigating investigators : Examining witnesses’ influence on investigators. Law and Human Behavior, vol. 30, n° 6, 707-732. (Lire le compte rendu sur PsychoTémoins).

Perona,A.R., Bottoms, B.L., & Sorenson, E. (2006). Research-based guidelines for child forensic interviews. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, vol. 13, n° 3/4, 81-129.

Pozzulo, J.D., Lemieux, J.M.T., Wells, E., & McCuaig, H.J. (2006). The influence of eyewitness identification decisions and age of witness on jurors’ verdicts and perceptions of reliability. Psychology, Crime and Law, vol. 12, n° 6, 641-652.

Sigurdsson, J.F., Gudjonsson, G.H., Einarsson, E., & Gudjonsson, G. (2006). Differences in personality and mental state between suspects and witnesses immediately after being interviewed by the police. Psychology, Crime and Law, vol. 12, n° 6, 619 - 628.

Strange, D., Sutherland, R., & Garry, M. (2006). Event plausibility does not determine children’s false memories. Memory, vol. 14, n° 8, 937-951. (Lire le compte rendu sur PsychoTémoins).

Thoresen, C., Lønnum, K., Melinder, A., Stridbeck, U., & Magnussen, S. (2006). Theory and practice in interviewing young children : A study of Norwegian police interviews 1985-2002. Psychology, Crime and Law, vol. 12, n° 6, 629-640.